A few weeks ago I compared Mike McCarthy to Mike Tice. I was wrong. This douche is the worst ever. I am not even going to present as evidence the most unimaginative game plan in history. He sucks because of that, hard. No, I am talking about the challenge that was issued by him when AP scored on the game winning touchdown. First, why does it even matter if he scored or not? He had torched the Pack for almost 200 yards rushing already so why would McCarthy all of a sudden believe that the D could stop him? The Packers needed as much time as they could to drive within field goal range and the Vikes would have just wasted clock. Second, we only had two timeouts left before the challenge. I am unsure of the time left but there was not much. But Rodgers is fail anyway so it would not have mattered. The good thing is that this is only hastening the removal of the entire front office for their idiocy. The most surreal part? There are still people defending this and believing that the team is in good hands.
2 comments:
couldn't agree more about challenging AP's touchdown - even if they win the challenge, how does it help them. weird.
by the way, it kills me that we are probably going to squander AP's best years (barry sanders anyone?)
Yeah, being an RB, he probably has five years, tops, at this level that he is playing at. Barry Sanders is an apt comparison. But maybe a Jim McMahon is playing in college now and the Vikes draft him (not likely) and then you may be the '85 Bears. It could happen. I also saw that your running back coach is Eric Bieniemy, one of my all time faves from Colorado.
Post a Comment